Support |
> I would have thought any live looping program would > want to eliminate latency as much as possible though, > it would be really nice if the program could > "play" a test pulse which could be routed out > of the soundcard , and then back in again and recorded. > The value obtained could then be used to make everything line up. > > andy butler I doubt that would be needed. We're talking software here and the computer must "know" the latency value, so it can be compensated for in any aspect BUT "live recording". I've been working a lot with Logic and SX and these programs does compensate automatically and it must be possible to do that even in looping software. But a computer can never "know" what you (the "analog" musician) is going to play into the recording input in the next second. It only "knows" what was recorded the second before. But, as I pointed out before, this is all right even for live looping since the machine needs only a couple of milliseconds to calculate latency compensation and line up the recording with the spinning loop. I don't know much about software developing but I guess it's called a "look-a-head function". Best wishes Per Boysen ________________ www.boysen.se www.looproom.com --> 1st Swedish Looping Festival