Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Damn Thats incredible, I really wish this could be written for Mac osx licensed by Matthias and Kim. That would be incredible. As it stands it seems a little unfair to just rip another persons invention so obviously. At least the author isn't trying to make money of it though. Damn why doesn't anyone write a de3cent looper for the Mac. Geoff on 17/3/03 8:07 pm, Jesse Ray Lucas at jlucas@neoprimitive.net wrote: > I have been watching Linux, but so far there just isn't enough really >good > audio software (or maybe I'm just not aware of it) available to make me > think the switch is viable. Although, now that Mac has gone UNIX-based >with > OSX, maybe some of those developers might start thinking about porting to > Linux. It would be a smaller leap now... > > Hey, look at what I just found on one of those Linux pages: > > "Sooperlooper is a "looping sampler very much like the Gibson/Oberheim > Echoplex Digital Pro". It is written by Jesse Chappell and is available >from > http://dexterssandbox.com/sooperlooper/." > > "SooperLooper is a looping sampler very much like the Gibson/Oberheim > Echoplex Digital Pro (EDP). In fact, it is a downright emulation of an >EDP, > with some additional features and a silly name. I figured that the EDP > feature-set is powerful, proven, and popular -- so why not implement it >as a > LADSPA plugin we can all use? It is a true realtime software looper if >used > with a low-latency Linux kernel and the proper audio buffer >configuration." > > I see this has been mentioned in the archives before, but just in case >you > are brave, thinking Linux, and haven't heard. > > -J > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jim Palmer" <jimp@pobox.com> > To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:18 AM > Subject: RE: Realtime os (was kim's refreshing...) > > >>> ... >>> I wonder why enterprises like Apple dont create a real time version >>> of their OS, limited and optimized for specific use. >>> In most studios I see a Mac with nothing but ProTools installed to >>> make it safe. They have a second computer for Internet and such. So >>> an OS that looks like the MacOS but only serves audio soft would >>> certainly be much safer and quicker... >>> ... >> >> i am not personally involved in this, but there is a group doing just >> this for linux: >> http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/resourceslatency.php3 >> >> http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/ >> >> sadly, i have not had time to look into it deeply, but >> on the surface, it looks like they have got latency down to >> low single digit ms (i've seen 1.5ms claimed) >> >> this is on my (rather long) list of things to check out... >> >