Support |
At 05:31 AM 6/20/2003, jimfowler wrote: >SIT DOWN WHEN YOU LOOP. i still can't nail the tempo when i try and >balance on one foot while clicking buttons with the other. Maybe that's also a question of practice? I often find performers who sit down when they could be standing to be a little boring to watch. I guess it depends on the context and instrument and type of music, but most times I think standing is better. I think it affects the energy of the music and the engagement between performer and audience as well. >you're gonna have to drill this into your drummers head because he's used >to being the one who picks and maintains the tempo, but now that you're >looping, YOU ARE THE METRONOME. the drummer must follow you, not the >other way around. i'm still reminding my drummer that once a loop is >running, that's the tempo he has to follow. This seems too rigid to me, and kind of like an excuse for looping musicians who haven't developed the skills to control their loops very well. In a band, everybody should be listening to everybody, and taking responsibility that they are playing their own part in time with everybody else. That *includes* you and your loops. Yes, the others should listen and lock in to you also, but when your loop is shifting out of tempo with everyone else, you need to know how to adjust it! that might include: - tapping the loop in time to begin with - retriggering loops to get aligned back with the downbeat (manual sync) - adjusting tempo controls to beat match - redefining loop lengths on the fly - re-recording the loop on the fly if necessary - generating sync clocks from other players for the looper to follow - etc. Stamping your foot and insisting that everybody else has to obey the tempo of your loop seems like a good way to end up being a solo musician since nobody else will want to play with you. kim ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@loopers-delight.com | http://www.loopers-delight.com