Support |
Hi, Sorry to say the laws of physics haven't changed all that much yet. I think that has something to do with why the V-Bass didn't have a built-in MIDI out and appears to track so much better-- the attacks (at least) are derived from signal processing instead of pitch detection/resynthesis. Nonetheless, the GI-20 tracks as well or better than any other pitch-to-midi device I've tried. It follows bends and slides nicely. From the few days experience I have with it, I'm estimating it outputs a midi note after about 3 cycles. For the lowest note on my bass, that's 40 milliseconds which is an awfully long time to wait :-) But that's to be expected, and I am not even trying to use it for rhythmic attacks, but rather to trigger textural sounds that layer in with processed pickup signals. Yes, it requires a GK-compatible pickup with the lovely little 13-pin DIN connectors. I took apart a GK-2B and rebuilt it to fit the string spacing on my upright, and it works great for pizz but not arco (it's a magnetic coil so no wonder), and I'm building a GK splitter/router box now. I'm hoping to try a Lightwave optical pickup soon. -Alex S. >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Alex Stahl" <alex@pixar.com> >> I like the "made in real-time" distinction somewhat more than the >> "bass only" constraint, partially because I just got a new Roland >> GI-20 pitch-to-midi converter and am having fun layering Korg Z1 >> sounds over the bass and might want to feel free to use that. > >Hi Alex, > >How do you like the GI-20? (I assume it requires a GK-2B pickup?) I >have an >old GM-70/GK-1 that is slow to track lower notes on my guitar due to >the physics >of lower pitches having longer wavelengths. Has the software algorithms >improved to the point where the GI-20 can actually track well on a bass? > >Cheers, > >Bill