RE: Repeater latency

["Per Boysen" <per@boysen.se>]

> From: Kim Flint [mailto:kflint@loopers-delight.com] 

> that's a test of the sync accuracy, not the direct through 
> audio latency 
> which I think is what Per is referring to.

That's correct. 

> noticeable latency. I measured it at 12.5ms on my scope.

Big thanks for that, Kim! Good to also know what you are hearing ;-)
 
> 
> The echoplex passes direct audio through as analog, and the delay is 
> probably more on the order of nanoseconds and imperceptible

I have no problem at all with the minimal echoplex latency. In fact I'm
using its direct signal in my live looping rigg. But the repeater - no
way! It goes with "direct input mute" all the time. 

> From: Eric Williamson [mailto:erwill@suitandtieguy.com] 
>
> i had a difficult time playing around the delay. for textural things 
> it's okay, for chords it's okay, but for wah clavinet type parts it's 
> irritating.

Try muting the direct signal and putting it in a send loop. The repeater
is great for rythmic stuff IMHO. 

Best wishes

Per Boysen
---> www.boysen.se
---> www.looproom.com
Next gig:
28 July, Stockholm Jazz Festival
05 Aug 13.00, Umeå, Noliamässan