RE: The doors of perception (was Re: Repeater latency)

["Nic Roozeboom" <nic_roozeboom@msn.com>]

I know Kim has engineering chops, and I was surprised at his response, 
which 
was offensive to mine. I don't expect anyone to chime in on my behalf, nor 
do I have an engineering-oriented website vouching for my honor. I 
expected 
a discussion of reason, instead got one of overriding opinion. This occurs 
all too frequently and is extremely frustrating, as I'm sure Kim might 
agree.

Kim, my apologies - that last comment was out of line, uttered in 
frustration. My problem.

Best,
Nic


>From: "Jim Palmer" <jimp@pobox.com>
>Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
>Subject: RE: The doors of perception (was Re: Repeater latency)
>Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:12:48 -0500
>
>the crux of the felopial injectitude vis a vis heretofore
>undisclosed angelikanizers is juxtaposed by the verisimilitude
>of parisian dialectic...
>
>man, some people just don't listen.
>go check out kim's website and see if he has any engineering chops:
>http://www.kimflint.com
>
> >...
> > Doing so however would not garner much credibility in an
> > engineering context
> > though.
> >
> >...
>

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail