Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
>I've said it before, but Digital Performer is *1* feature away from >being one of the most amazing loopers out there. If only there was >public outcry for them to add a feedback control to POLAR I would >probably sell my Repeater in a heartbeat. well, its a completely different structure. Its samples. There is no feedback. So its not just the control for the feedback that lacks. And there are still a lot of other good features that Polar has less than the Repeater, no? > >Mark Sottilaro > >On Saturday, August 23, 2003, at 03:22 PM, Kim Flint wrote: > >>At 10:49 AM 8/23/2003, Mark Sottilaro wrote: >>> There have recently been a few posts about what Reaktor 4 can do >>>and it sounds amazingly promising. >> >>So for years now I've been hearing about all the potential and >>promise of Reaktor for creating loopers. Even more years for >>Max/MSP. >> >>I'm still waiting. >> >>Every looper I've seen created in these was really limited and >>basically didn't go beyond looping functions from 30 years ago. >>User interfaces were poorly thought out or non-existent. Features >>are incomplete and not fully fleshed out. Is this promise ever >>going to be realized, or is this just a nice fantasy that's never >>going to come true? >> >>Please, somebody show me one really good, modern looper created this way. >> >>kim >> >> >>______________________________________________________________________ >>Kim Flint | Looper's Delight >>kflint@loopers-delight.com | http://www.loopers-delight.com -- ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org