Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Ahhhhh yes the EDP wish list I recieved this from a french programmer looper who has been working on a piece of software (and finished it) to address some of the edp's limitations. This is what he said. .............. We used it for a show 2 weeks ago with no problem. It can work on a G4 800 mhz with something like 1go ram. It run on os X. The user can record, overdub, multiply, copy current loop in other loop, mute and this with three different loops. there's also an auto-fade function for long fade in or long fade out (one loop length max...). You can access to the different loops with next-loop, one clic for next-loop at the end of the loop and two clics for an immediate change of loop. It is possible to use two loops in row and then if you do next-loop, you go from A to B and B to A, or you can use it with the three loops in row, at each next-loop you go to the next loop : A B C A B C, etc... You can also access directly from A to C for example with the C key : One clic to change at the end of the current loop and two clics to change immediately... In the preferences, it is possible to choose the number of buffers per loop, ten max and the loop length with no limit (except your ram's limit !!-)...). As every overdub is recorded in a different buffer, you can undo step by step... You can route the outputs with a matrix to each of you soundcard outputs. You can also mute one or more voice or solo it... And lot of other features... ....................... He has basically created this to bypass the performance limitations of the edp. It sounds very cool, I am hoping he lets me have a look at it soon.... Hopefull Geoff p.s. my biggest personal wish is that the edp gets a new front panel as its existing one is outdated for the amount of parameters u need to access regularly. Ahh well midi control it is. on 28/10/03 7:33 am, Travis at tiktok@sprintmail.com wrote: > I wish the EDP could dynamically add loops, so that instead of having > to define the number of loops beforehand with MoreLoops, you could > start with just 1, and then hit Next Loop and have it behave the way it > does now (copying the time or audio or whatever) and so on. I like to > have pieces with two or three or four loops, but I don't know before > hand, and I want to be able to switch between loop 1 and 2 easily, > without having to step through as-yet unused loops 3,4, etc. And if I > decide I want five loops, and I've got the free memory (which I always > do), I wish I could move to loop 5 (for example) without having to > clear everything out and reset the MoreLoops parameter. > > I suspect this isn't possible with the current architecture, but maybe > someday... > > TravisH >