Re: THE LOOPING TOOLS I USE

["Doug Cox" <dougcox@pdq.net>]

Yes, in my humble opinion, there are some devices listed as loopers during
this survey that are "questionable" re: their ability to actually loop.
However, I'm going to wait until tomorrow (when I stop tallying) to propose
what to do to narrow down the devices - if I even propose that at all.

Also, I don't doubt that people are using the VG-8 (purely an example) to
create long delay lines.  And really, without starting some never-ending
debate, I don't think we can exclude long delay lines from this survey.
However, there is something to be said for basic statistics here, and we
could eliminate the "outliers" from the data before we compile it.  That
would involve dropping the low occurances... ie, those that were only 
listed
once or twice across the entire population.

More thoughts later.  I'm tired!

Doug
----- Original Message -----
From: "S V G" <vsyevolod@yahoo.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: THE LOOPING TOOLS I USE


>
>      I didn't know that the VG-8 or VG-88 was used as a looper.  Are you
sure about this?  Are
> there any other questionable "loopers" on this list you've compliled?
>
>      Stephen
>
>
> > > If you want to correct your data, please email me off-list.  At this
point,
> > the general consensus seems to be - if you currently own it, and
commonly
> > use it specifically for looping (vs. simple echo/delay) - it's in your
> > reponse.
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
>