Re: interpreting the LOOPING TOOLS list and an appreciation

["David" <vze2ncsr@verizon.net>]

The thing to remember is that this e-list is very heavily slanted toward 
the
EDP -- as it's known as a resource where the EDP designers regularly
contribute and answer questions.

As was pointed out by the Boomerang posters - with that tool you just plug
in and away you go.I imagine for DL4 users reading about this "expensive"
EDP thing is just a tease and unnecessary for them.

Placing this question in some fashion on the home page and seeing the
results from that would yield somewhat different results.

Is that possible?

David

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "loop.pool" <rickwalker@looppool.info>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 6:32 AM
Subject: interpreting the LOOPING TOOLS list and an appreciation


> Dear Doug,
>
> Thanks so much for taking the time to tell us a bit more about who we are
> here.
> It was a lot of work and it is really interesting to read.   L.D. owes 
>you
a
> large debt of gratitude.
>
>
> Now the results:    I'm actually a bit surprised that the total numbers
are
> as low as they are.
> No wonder the people at Line 6 just couldn't be bothered when we asked
them
> to add
> midi clock syncability to their DL4 (boy that pissed me off one NAMM 
>after
> the Echo Pro
> was released without that obvious function).
>
> I also know because I have been meeting live loopers coming out of the
wazoo
> lately who are not
> on Loopers Delight, so there are obviously a lot more statistics to be
> revealed in time.
>
> Which brings me to the subject of my next post (see the next one
> chronologically on this list)
>
> Ciao for now..........Rick Walker
>
>
> Don't worry Doug, lol,  I
>
>