Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
I've used both Live and the Repeater in a few different kinds of situations. I think that the Repeater is still superior in the improv / ease of use situations, but live is definitely more powerful. If you were going to be playing an instrument and controlling pre-recorded loops, I'd say use Live. If you were going to be playing an instrument and recording loops live, I'd say that you definitely want a repeater. If you aren't going to be playing an instrument, then you'll probably be better off with Live. Kevin ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Ritsu Katsumata <rk93@cornell.edu> Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:03:54 -0500 >It's been about a year since I first became a looper (with the >Loopstation) and now, I'm looking at increasing my looping-horsepower. > >I was hoping you could advise me on whether to go with ABLETON LIVE >or ELECTRIX REPEATER (if I can find one). > >Currently, I'm working on a project that requires looping >pre-recorded samples, some as short as 4 beats, and one digital audio >file that's about 8 minutes long (I can eliminate that one if it's >impossible). >I'd like to be able to live loop over any one at a time, and also >trigger up to three pre-recorded loops on the fly. > >I need to be able to control all of this with a foot pedal, and be >simple enough for me to learn to use before the premiere of the >performance piece on April 26! > > >Thanks in advance! > > >-- >Ritsu Katsumata >-------------->>>www.ritsu.com > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Kevin Goldsmith remove "online" from reply address Unit Circle Media http://www.unitcircle.com ------------------------------------------------------------- --