Support |
I wonder if it is because I only play through headphones at home that I am so sensitive to it in live situation? You raise a good point. I figure it might be because few players, like myself, are not exposed to multiple playing conditions..... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Sottilaro" <sine@zerocrossing.net> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 1:38 PM Subject: Re: Ebay echoplexi... (spoiler: Gibson bashing thread) > At 70 degrees F the speed of sound is 1129.5 ft per sec. So figure 1.1 > ft per millisecond. A device like the Repeater, with a 11 msec latency > will sound as if it's 12.1 feet away from you. The fact that you don't > hear an electric guitar from the source means the guitar has a natural > latency based on the fact that the sound source isn't in your hands. > So add another 5 feed in my studio, more when I play out. My mind > seems to instantly compensate for this. I wonder what makes some > people so much more sensitive to this than others? Maybe you get used > to it. Not a single instrument I own has 0 latency due to digital > conversion or MIDI latency. The plus side is it makes my studio seem > bigger to me in a subliminal way, I guess. People have always told me > that I'm not "all there" so maybe that's it. I'm over there a bit. > > Mark > > On Jun 12, 2004, at 11:53 PM, David J. Grossman wrote: > > > > > > > In theory, the idea of a digitally processed and modelled guitar > > signal is a > > great idea. In reality, I feel that any significant latency in the > > signal is > > unacceptable for my purposes. Especially since, as a bass player, I > > strive > > to nail the beat and be in time with my drummer. That is the primary > > reason > > I've stayed away from the V-Bass. Before I buy one, I'd have to be > > 100% sure > > that the latency is completely inaudible. > > > > - Dave > > >