Support |
Google the specs and details on the Yamaha MD-4 minidisk recorder. I have the MD-8 (love it!), and a good friend owns the MD-4 (qually great, just less channels). He's looking to sell his MD-4 for $200 plus shipping. If you're interested, you're welcome to email me off-list. Not exactly "small", but definitely a good balance of portability with a solid build quality. Doug ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mountain Man" <mtman@cloud9.net> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 4:42 PM Subject: OT: other recorder recommendations ? > I asked for recommendations for a small, portable multi-track recorder a > while back. Based on a recommendation here, I bought a Zoom PS-04. I > was quite disappointed with it. Aside from the cheap construction, the > interface wasn't at all intuitive (at least for me). There's no undo, > and I couldn't find a simple, easy-to-use way to erase a single track or > a whole recording. In addition, the looping feature doesn't seem to > work properly. > > Oh well, on to the Korg PXR4, I thought. A hundred dollars more, but > surely a more usable unit. It arrived today. Hmmmm. Shoddy > construction. Hard-to-read and hard-to-navigate menus. It does have > undo. But erasing tracks/songs seems to be just as hard as the Zoom (in > fact, I can't even find an entry in the index for erase or delete). And > no looping. Fifteen minutes of trying to figure out why the thing > doesn't do what I expect, and the lack of intuitiveness has me ready to > throw in the towel. Sigh. > > So, can someone suggest a small, take-it-with-you multitrack? It > doesn't necessarily need to be digital; I'm open to minidisk, or other > technologies. And it doesn't have to be studio quality; this is intended > for use at jam sessions to play along with, and capture ideas. It > *does* have to be easy to use! And good build quality would be a plus > as well. Any suggestions? > > Thanks in advance for your suggestions, > Elby >