Support |
"Still, what they did that was good, was really good." Your statement is concise and (I believe) totally accurate. The 3-LP live set was phenomenal. Utterly brilliant. Pictures at an Exhibition? Brilliant. Well, I suppose it's all subjective, innit? Well, for the record (pun), I'm with you: when they were good, they were very very good. > [Original Message] > From: Jesse Lucas <jlucas@neoprimitive.net> > To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > Date: 2/3/2005 4:02:10 PM > Subject: Re: OT ELP/JP (rip) > > ELP was the shit. Tarkus changed my life. > > Some of the later stuff was...well...just wrong. Love Beach? This is > the same guy who played on In the Court of the Crimson King and Tarkus? > > Oh well. > > Still, what they did that was good, was really good. > > Emerson's organ sound on the first two albums is the best. > > -J > > > > Suit & Tie Guy wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2005, at 12:40 PM, goddard.duncan@mtvne.com wrote: > > > >> they were a technically-accomplished trio, but quite lacking in any > >> creative sense-of-purpose or direction, & they managed to alienate > >> many peers in the business with their in-jokes & technical excesses. > >> > >> & thus peel described ELP as "a waste of /talent/ & electricity". > > > > > > even put into perspective, John Peel's comments were completely unfair. > > > > --- > > Eric Williamson > > www.suitandtieguy.com > > > > >