Support |
"Language irregularities don't really bother me tho, unless they distract me from understanding." Even as a pain-in-the-ass grammarian, I have to agree with you. Sure, it's fun to slag bad grammar, but the real enemy is language that is designed to deceive... "Clear Skies Initiative" is a real good example. All thinking people should read George Orwell's essays on how authoritarians "dumb down" their people through deliberately cloudy language. Con Mucho Queso, Tim M > [Original Message] > From: Gary Lehmann <hqr@cox.net> > To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > Date: 5/25/2005 2:34:22 AM > Subject: Grammar peeves > > OK, I am going to get in trouble now . . . > Right after the mispronunciation of "nuclear" (just say atomic) is > "The thing is, is . . ." and its various offspring. > Language irregularities don't really bother me tho, unless they distract me > from understanding. > I keep hearing broadcast journalists using "is, is"-- > Gary >