| 
 Support  | 
![]()  | 
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
| 
 I'm just going to weigh in that as far as looping goes, digital has nothing 
on analog.  I've been using two Sony TC-630 analog quarter track machines 
since 1982.  With the ability to turn off the erase heads, this allows 
me to create very deep and layered loops that no digital loop machine can 
rival.  A friend of mine the great looper Joseph Hammer uses an Ampex half 
track unit that he just by hand bypasses the erase head and creates real in 
depth layered loops.  To me, if one is serious about looping, analog is 
still far superior.  For live performance, I use two Digitech digital 
delays one for short loops (no more than 3.6 seconds) and one for longer loops 
(7.6 seconds max).  These do allow me the ability to create real time live 
loops to play over with myself solo or with an ensemble always completely 
improvised and yes this digital aspect is more reliable for performance.  
It is just that this digital looping does not quite have the depth and warmth of 
analog looping that i use in studio. 
Kenny Ryman  
(Paperbag, Points of Friction, KeDaVi, Meke Mombo, Greg Segal's 'Night 
Circus' etc.).. 
 |