Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
I agree that the EDP footswitch is a good size and covers a broad range of the features, particularly when you consider the original software, but it'd be nice to have the option to build a larger, or more specialized controller without being so dependent on third-party MIDI solutions. As I've frequently said, my number 1 wish for a future EDP is the ability to "learn" any MIDI input and map that to a function so that you can use a garden variety MIDI controller, which are dime a dozen, and bypass the need for a PC based foot controller programming utility. TravisH On 9/13/05, Matthias Grob <matthias@grob.org> wrote: > >Well said, Kim. One thing I'd always wondered though was why more > >features weren't accessible through resistor values not incorporated > >into the footswitch, such as halfspeed, individual loop access, > >separate access to rounded/unrounded multiply/record, etc? That'd > >allow people access to the deeper features without a MIDI controller. > > > > there is a voltage for the Parameter button, but its delicate. > your idea is interesting, but the EDP concept is to keep the number > of keys low. When we designed it, HalfSpeed was not planned and we > did not think people would like Reverse so much... > > It also would not work the voltages are not linearely spread > through this we can allow you to press a second switch! > try holding Overdub and do Insert, then let Overdub go... all on one > cable, amazing technology, no? Kims idea, if I remember right. > sad that the switches are not good enough... there are not many ready > ones that are not noisy. Bigger pedals productions invest in molds to > create their switches. > dont you think smaller, mainly flater would be nicer? > > dont you think the Behringer is too long? > Tom keeps joking that you recognize a looper by this thing sticking > out of his bag :-) > how about devided in two? > > > -- > > > ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org > >