[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Defining "pro"

To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
From: monk <monk@fuse.net>
Subject: Re: Defining "pro"
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:35:37 -0400


On Oct 18, 2005, at 4:06 PM, Suit & Tie Guy wrote:

> by "fixed by gibson" what do you mean?

i sent it back and paid them to fix it.. or am i misunderstanding the 
question?

References:
- Re: Defining "pro"
  - From: Suit & Tie Guy <erwill@suitandtieguy.com>
- Re: Defining "pro"
  - From: mark sottilaro <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com>
- Re: Defining "pro"
  - From: Travis Hartnett <travishartnett@gmail.com>
- Re: Defining "pro"
  - From: monk <monk@fuse.net>
- Re: Defining "pro"
  - From: Travis Hartnett <travishartnett@gmail.com>
- Re: Defining "pro"
  - From: monk <monk@fuse.net>
- Re: Defining "pro"
  - From: Suit & Tie Guy <erwill@suitandtieguy.com>

Prev by Date: sharing and playing nice with your friends
Next by Date: Re: Defining "pro"
Previous by Thread: Re: Defining "pro"
Next by Thread: Re: Defining "pro"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread
- Author