Support |
Jesse Chappell wrote: > Absolutely right. SL has no proper latency compensation yet, but it > is on my short list. > Thanks Jeff for describing the situation so clearly :) I tend to drone on about things I'm interested in, so I want to make sure it is understood that the purpose of my post was not to point out flaws in SooperLooper, but to address some of the concerns that have been raised recently about "software" as a viable alternative to "hardware". There are certainly things that we can't do as well in software, but in the area of recording accuracy we can do a pretty good job. The SooperLooper thread just gave me a chance to blather about that :-) Thanks. Jeff