Support |
On Dec 7, 2005, at 9:32, loop.pool wrote: > What I'm interested more in, quite frankly, is what are the > practical distinctions from a musical standpoint between the > two paradigms? For me, as a musician, there is in praxis no difference at all. And that is because I never, ever play my instruments THROUGH the looping software. I monitor/ampligy my audio input (instruments played) directly from the sound card out into the PA (or local amp) before it goes into the software. That's essential. When the looping software does compensate for the latency induced by the computer hardware I couldn't care less. My loops bounce back exactly as I played them and the machine has a complete loop round to fulfill its calculations. Last week I did a gig with only Möbious on a laptop and I had two percussionists with me (udu, kongoma, talking drum and shakers). I looped the percussion mic and my own flute mic into Möbius, sometimes on the same track, sometimes creating a percussion only track and sometimes layering it all into the same loop. None of us three felt any problem with the timing. I understand that musicians can experience difficulties if playing (their instrument's direct signal) through the software, but I don't do that. When I bring my EDP though, I can sometimes enjoy the easy going set up to play through the machine, but most of the time I even put the EDP in a send loop and turn its "mix" button all way right. Greetings from Sweden Per Boysen www.looproom.com (international) www.boysen.se (Swedish) ---> iTunes Music Store (digital) www.cdbaby.com/perboysen