Support |
The ULN2 sounds really good. It is a superb, high-quality piece of equipment. And is highly recommended. (BTW, I also have an 896 on my desktop that I love.) My decision to go with the m-audio was based on several decisions. (These are the same reasons I would probably go with the Ultralight now): 1) Durability 2) Size/Weight 3) Functionality 3) Cost When you are lugging around a lot of gear, every inch and ounce counts. (somebody should have fun with that.) And while pres make a very big difference, in a standard house system at a club with less than pristine acoustics.....will the difference really be noticed? For me, the $500 and something dollar difference has been well spent (?) on other things....mainly, um, beer.... cheers, Jeff Jeff Kaiser http://www.jeffkaisermusic.com pfMENTUM.com • AngryVegan.com On Mar 19, 2006, at 11:00 AM, David Morton wrote: > On 3/19/06, mrweasel <mrweasel@eircom.net> wrote: >> It looks good, but it sounds expensive compared to what a motu >> traveler can >> offer (apart from the preamps maybe) > > I like some MOTU stuff, I have an 896HD on my desktop setup, but I > don't use its mic pres. > > I considered the Traveller when I needed a something for the laptop, > but the ULN2 won (its preamps are superb) and as far as I'm concerned > the ULN2 is worth every penny. >