Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Hi Mark, happy to know you've made the same step I did. I was starting to feel the time was coming exactly when seeing all the rumbling ideas coming around those sw loopers. My set up is transforming itself from an eight rack space to a 4 rack space and I'm only gaining power and flexibility. One of the main things I have always being considering is the capability of the user interface: I feel that having the deepest visual control over what's happening to my audio signal is a descriminating fact, capable of letting me play or forcing me to a position of control, this last option being the worst situation I love. So, happy to know you're enjoyng Mobius, I've never seen such a will to develop an already excellent tool as I'm experiencing within its growing community. my best, Luca mark sottilaro wrote: >OK, a while ago I fooled around with Mobius and >Sooperlooper unsuccessfully. Not sure why, probably >under powered in the computer dept. Well last week my >Toshiba dual core 2gighz machine showed up on my >doorstep (literally, I can't believe UPS fucking left >it on my doorstep with no signature or attempt to >leave it with a neighbor or have me pick it up at >UPS!) > >It's a nice little laptop and Toshiba direct had a >great deal going so it ended up being a little more >costly than a Macbook, but I got a bigger screen and >more memory and a nicer video card. Also, it's blue. > >For the first week I just played around with >softsynths. Man I love some of the instruments that >come with Reaktor 5. Anyone make a good Reaktor based >looper? > >But the real win was last night when I started up >Mobius. (M-Audio Firewire Solo and a MOTU Fastlane >MIDI USB) After a little futz'n getting the right >audio card settings, the application worked like a >dream. 8 stereo tracks of sweet loops. Must be very >mindful of levels, but over all I had an amazing time >and I never looked at the manual at all. Very nicely >laid out especially if you're someone who's used an >EDP. It latched on to my clock coming from a Mac >desktop running Digital Performer and aside from one >glitch (ending an overdub caused it to loose sync. I >couldn't replicate it though) it all worked perfectly. > My next project is to get it to work with "or" tracks >instead of "and" tracks as seems to be it's default. >Now I see what Per's been talking about. The possibilites.... > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > > >. > > >