Support |
I have been reading a lot of reviews on the Eclipse and Fireworx. Oddly, there appear to be a lot of mixed reviews on the Eclipse for it lack of flexibility, ability to load only two algorithms, etc...I read a lot of positive reviews on the Fireworx for how you can customize your effect algorithms, and the diversity of tone mangling....though I hear you can use up your processing power fairly quickly. Then I found this interesting passage on the Yahoo Group on Fireworx: **************************** 1. Eventide Eclipse: You cannot create algorithms. There are two DSP program slots into which you load presets which can then be tweaked to you hearts content. There are great choruses, reverbs, pitchers, etc, and you even get some combination algos. The sound quality is awesome, in my experience, the stability is not as good. Support is OK, as long as you aren't one of the few who rub the wrong way with their ONLY support person, who can be quite obstinate. I eventually sold my Eclipse and bought the Orville, about which I sometimes have mixed feelings. Then I listen to how great it sounds. 2. TC Fireworx: Ultimate flexibility up to the limits of the DSP. Design algos using building blocks. Fun is the word; more like Eventide's high end units, but designed to be programmed from the front panel instead of the computer. Sound quality is not as pristine as any Eventide unit, but look at this in context of your musical style. Support is OK, as long as you don't expect them to change the unit (there is a known bugs that they will never fix in DELAY2). I use my 2 Fireworx units for EVERYTHING. One is on guitars and one is on the main mix. I wish I had 2 more. The difference then: Eclipse is like a video game with two cartridge slots. Fireworx is like sonic legos. Orville is like sonic clay. ****************************** I'm amost set on the Fireworx now, but still grappling over Reaktor 5. I may get the Fireworx, and then Reaktor after that. Am I an effect addict or what? :) Kris