Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
> --- Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> wrote: >> I don't think I >> would be able to >> handle more than three simultaneous looping >> processes anyway. On 26 jul 2006, at 19.31, mark sottilaro wrote: > Isn't that the truth? With an 8 stereo track looper > in my clutches I've never gone higher than 3 tracks. > One haveing 2-3 loops in it and the others one. I > can't imagine being able to deal with much more. Yeah, I heard humans are "two-channeled", "double-tasking", creatures. If we do more than two tasks simultaneously we have to constantly push one task over to be handled by merely automatic reflexes. That's why if you are driving (1) and smoking (2) you should really put out your cigarette before answering that cell phone call (3). There's a 33 % risk that "driving" will be left for its own devices ;-) Don't remember where I first heard it, but fact is I snagged that piece of info for my lectures on "improvisational technics in praxis and theory". If you make music with more than three general "themes" happening you either have a problem to perform it in real-time or you will have to start looking into "generative music" (not totally un-cool either ;-) Greetings from Sweden Per Boysen www.boysen.se (Swedish) www.looproom.com (international) http://tinyurl.com/fauvm (podcast) http://www.myspace.com/looproom