Support |
Paul: What sort of monitor did you get, and where? Dave O'Heare oheareATmagmaDOTca ----- Original Message ----- From: <phaslem@wightman.ca> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:13 PM Subject: RE: Looping Laptops in general (WAS Products, Services, andLooping Gear "Packages") >>> And if something does go wrong, with something like the Looperlative I >>> can get in touch with the developer and get assistance that will cover >>> anything that has gone amiss. >> > > Actually, this is exactly the reason I ended up going with a software > looper. > Last summer I had several shows to do and my edp went down, there was no > one > that could service it here in Canada, the company wanted me to ship it to > Nashville and told me it would be 3 months minimum before I got it back. > So I > looked into the software solutions. At first I was using an old compac > m300 > that worked quite fine even though it had certain limitations due to the > speed > and ram (600mhz and 276 mgram). I did share in some of the concerns >about > the > fragile nature of laptops in general and eventually settled on building >my > own > rackmount computer. I was able to build a 1u rackmount p4 with a 3.06 >cpu, > 1 > gig ram, 120 gig 7600rpm hard drive, a used aardvark q10 pci interface > that has > 8 decent quality mic pre's, and a small 8" touch screen monitor for about > $900.00. I know the monitor is kinda of small and you don't want to do >any > reading with it, but this computer is only for music. no internet hookup > at > all. I've been using it quite a bit for 4 months now and no problems. >The > only > thing that can fall off the rack and get damaged is the touch screen > monitor > and it can be replaced for about $150.00. Because it is a computer I can > upgrade the motherboard, cpu, memory all with minimal problems. > For me this was a great solution over the rig that I was using, gave me > more > flexibility and greater potentials for sounds that I was seeking to > utilize. > > Of course there are reasons for going with hardware loopers, but for me > this was > the best overall solution. > > Paul Haslem > > www.dulcify.ca >