Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
can you clock protools (only now, not live) to the rc-50 just to get the existing loops in? also, i don't know if i'd call myself a protools guru, but they have asked me on a couple of occasions to be a beta tester for them.. you might want to re-clock your protools so that the tempo's line up. but really, if you know about digital recording, then you know that there is absolutely no way that you can get any two digital devices to agree on any tempo without being clocked together. it seems kind of unrealistic, again, unless i'm misunderstanding. when you say "recorded a song live" does that mean with a whole band/ other tracks? or just your loops? were the units clocked together when recording? why not adjust the tempo in protools down .5 bpm (or whatever..) to get it to match? On Feb 12, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Teddy wrote: > yes, but... along with the SAME loops that were recorded live > through an amp. > > I'm a pro tools guru, if it were only recording the loops into PT > and synching it with tempo I would have been done in 3.4 seconds > like you said. > > what I've done is recorded a song live with the rc-50 running > through an amp. > it's a performance that I don't want to change, just help it out a > little. > so, to help out the sound of it I want to re-record the RC-50 loops > back into pt. > then I have to sync those with the (same) loops that were recorded > already. > > do you see what I'm doing now? am I explaining it enough? > > I think the only REAL way is to record the loops back into my live > session after the fact for the whole song duration and ignore PT's > tempo. > kind of sucks though cause then if I want to loop other stuff in PT > I have no tempo sync > > thanks for your help > > teddy > > On Feb 12, 2007, at 10:02 AM, monk wrote: > >> i read the other email and it doesn't explain why it won't work. >> unless i'm misunderstanding. you want to take the loops you've >> made on the rc-50 and use them in a protools session? please clarify. >> >> >> On Feb 12, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Teddy wrote: >> >>> that won't work with what I'm doing. >>> see my next email which explains my process a bit more in detail. >>> >>> thanks anyway. >>> >>> Teddy >>> >>> On Feb 12, 2007, at 9:50 AM, monk wrote: >>> >>>> all you have to do is use the grid mode and resize the loop to >>>> whatever the new tempo is. it takes about 3.4 seconds. > > > >