Re: Flow and Electronic Musical Instrument Design

[nemoguitt@aol.com]

boy i sure hope we hear some ideas around per's observation.....if i 
were "invited" to play with the jazzers again. FAT CHANCE.....i would 
just take guitar/rang/sans amp/champ.....i did get some feedback that 
the sax player thought my AIR-FX was nothing more than a gimmic 
(SP).....i wonder what he thought about my bitrman/ineko 
freakout.....:).....who am i playin with, what do i want to schlepp, 
will there be at least an "audient" tm, do i want to loop or not, these 
are few of many questions as to whether i want to per down or supersize 
up my kit.....but what the duck do i know?.....:).....2-nite is 2 weeks 
since that gig and i haven't even taken the instuments to my studio, 
but what i  find more amazing is all i have played since then is about 
20 min. wankin on my akustic guit.....20 min. in 2 weeks, i need the 
brain doctor!.....i'd rather watch the birds in my 
garden!.....yikes.....but that has "parameters" too.....michael


http://www.myspace.com/klobuchar10
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzepmeci/
www.ct-collective.com


-----Original Message-----
From: perboysen@gmail.com
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Sent: Fri, 18 May 2007 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: Flow and Electronic Musical Instrument Design

  A funny detail, regarding this mental work, is that in praxis it cooks 
down to the simple question "which parameters can I take away to reduce 
my options?" But when I talk to fellow musicians I'm finding that quite 
a lot of people think about it in the opposite way, as "how can I get 
more options available?" ;-) 

________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free 
from AOL at AOL.com.
=0