Support |
A lot of people here seem to be using the Fireface400 or Fireface800, and some of them are using even both (Hi Luca), so I'd like to do a comparison of both and ask whether I missed anything here: Since some people need more than the 2 micpres supplied by the Fireface400, I also considered a variant with a Quadmic. So here we go: Fireface 800 Fireface 400 FF400+Quadmic Price(Street) €1219 €879 €1254 Form factor fullrack halfrack fullrack I/O In: Micpre 4 2 6 In: total 10 8 8 Out: total 10 8 8 digi I/O 16 8 8 MIDI I/O 1 2 2 Standalone mixer * * LineIn limiter * Summarizing: both interfaces seem to be lacking for applications which require lots of microphones - for a singing drummer e.g., both the FF400 and the FF800 don't offer enough micpres. There is the option of extending the interfaces with similar-quality micpres using the quadmic or octamic pres by RME, at a price - the combo of FF400 and Quadmic (which gives you 6 pres, prolly enough for most solo applications) is even more expensive than the FF800. There are a few small details which might be of interest to some users. The FF400's standalone mixer functionality is great if your computer crashes mid-performance. On the other hand, the FF800's limiter saves you yet another device (and thus rack real estate), especially when going into the interface with transient-prone instruments (e.g. bass guitar). Sadly, it's not available for the mic ins. And again, the additional pair of MIDI I/O of the FF400 might also save you another device in the setup. Worth mentioning (but I guess not for our typical applications) is the additional pair of ADAT I/O on the FF800. Did I miss something here? Rainer