Support |
Quoting Qua Veda <qua@oregon.com>: > > I have a RME FF800 that has 8outputs. I have 5 identical cabinets plus a > sub. I use 5 outs to go to FrontL, FrontR, C, RearL, RearR. My Front L&R > have a special crossover for the sub, so they get full range, and the > crossover takes care of the split. > Qua, You have described my system -- RME FF800, 5 SRM450s, and two SWA1501s. The only difference is that I've opted to address the subs discretely. To date, I have sent the same signal to both subs however I would like to do some work where I address them seperately. I've limited myself to 5.1 because my Cubase SX3 mixer has an internal 5.1 buss. I can do 5.2 by using a 5.0 buss and then a L-R or two mono channels for the subs. I have been told that when using two subs that one can get some remarkable phasing effects, etc. However, one of my subs must go to the shop :( so it will be a while before I can play with it. My approach is to mix everything to 5.1 from the start -- and then fold that mix down to stereo. This is pretty easy with the FF800. Thus, I can supply surround AND stereo mixes concurrently. To fold up from stereo to surround is tough compared to folding down. My K2600 has a MONO-to-Stereo algorithm -- it splits the mono signal into frequency bands and then each band can be panned and/or delayed. This produces a downright shocking amount of stereo realism. By way of example, you will find on my website a remix of a Bach work that I did on my A3340s. The first three channels were submixed to mono and then I added three more tracks and then another track live for a total of seven. In the remix, I processed the mono track through the K2600 (as described above). In the "old" days -- one could easily hear when the mono track was the only one playing -- just panned to the center. In the remix, one must listen pretty intently to pick up the difference between the mono track and the discreet stereo. http://kevinkissinger.com/downloads/music/BachDminorM03hi.mp3 To fold up stereo to surround, one could utilize a similar approach -- that is, to split the stereo channels into frequency bands and then pan/delay then to the various speakers. The key to the effect is delay -- to pan only just gives the effect of "panned" mono but careful application of delay makes all the difference. Well, I will hit <send> -- there are other responses to this that I haven't yet read and look forward to reading other comments. -- Kevin