Support |
From: "Dan" <danielalbertini72@yahoo.com> > That sounds like an awesome system extraordinaire!!! My friend and > teacher Rick Turner may be > able to help you with more specific design? R. Neve and him exchange > neural transmissions on a > regular basis. Rick had a huge hand in designing and building The > Grateful Dead soundsystems and > instruments he designed and built!!! I design and build custom guitars > that represent countless > challenging hours of commitment to my field, the art of luthiery. I sub > out electronic work > utilizing the elite high end pickups Seymour Duncan, Sunrise, EMG, etc. > --- Qua Veda <qua@oregon.com> wrote: > >> I have a RME FF800 that has 8outputs. I have 5 identical cabinets plus >a >> sub. I use 5 outs to go to FrontL, FrontR, C, RearL, RearR. My Front >L&R >> have a special crossover for the sub, so they get full range, and the >> crossover takes care of the split. >> >> I was able to get a DVD to play through the RME. After some trial and >> error, I was able to get it to play through the correct speakers. Home >> and >> computer surround processors use a special processor for splitting into >> 5.1 >> , but I'm not using that. >> >> So now, I am very interested in experimenting with "normal" and >> "abnormal" >> surround and spatial effects. I look forward to trying some of Per's >and >> Stephen's suggestions. But it will have to wait for awhile since my >> gear >> is packed away due to remodeling. But I'm looking forward to some fun >> :-) Well, this has knocked loose some previously-unknown bits from the deep! I stared sniffing up surround processing and remembered [d-oh!] an experiment with an old track ("Fever Dream") to remix for surround, using Microsoft's WAVAVIMUX tool - it combines the separate channel wav files and an avi video (optional) into something that can be played through or on a surround system etc. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/howto/articles/creating71audio.aspx I recall that one of the wonderful things about surround was a bit like dolby: if it's already encoded into the audio stream, you don't have to do anything special to decode for listening. (For instance, duplicating a dolby-encoded tape: one turns the dolby off for the tape-to-tape and it remains encoded appropriately. How many of us didn't do this in the beginning, I wonder?) So I'm going to mess about with the output from the vsts I posted links to earlier, and see if I can exploit the record monitor for "What you hear" in order to see if a CD-R encoded using this sounds different than a CD-R of the same piece (before segregation-encoding) when played on a DVD player with surround. I'm cheap, part-Scottish, and don't ignore these little things when they pop up - and can't resist the idea of presenting a method for surround recording that doesn't require you to spend a year's salary on a DolbyTM or THXTM system. S.