[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: RE: computers suck creative energy

To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
From: "Buzap Buzap" <buzap@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: RE: computers suck creative energy
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:20:46 +0100

>But this should be considered a transitional thing.
Yeah, it's bad when you get stuck there.
And you're really lost when you mix up "musical progress" with simply 
"more gear" ;-))

Buzap

-- 
GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS.
Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail

Follow-Ups:
- Re: computers suck creative energy
  - From: Chris Sewell <lunamusic@mac.com>

References:
- Re: computers suck creative energy
  - From: Paul Richards <paulrichard_rocks@yahoo.com>
- Re: computers suck creative energy
  - From: kkissinger@kevinkissinger.com
- RE: computers suck creative energy
  - From: phillip wilson <phillwilson@hotmail.com>
- Re: computers suck creative energy
  - From: "Krispen Hartung" <khartung@cableone.net>
- Re: computers suck creative energy
  - From: "Matt Davignon" <mattdavignon@gmail.com>
- RE: computers suck creative energy
  - From: Glenn Poorman <glenn.poorman@autodesk.com>

Prev by Date: Re: How far does looping go back? Farther than you think....
Next by Date: Re: How far does looping go back? Farther than you think....
Previous by Thread: RE: computers suck creative energy
Next by Thread: Re: computers suck creative energy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread
- Author