Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Well, of course. I'm not intending to host the videos myself! But we need a central page to point people to with the text explanation. HOWEVER, if sound priority mode really works, I'm a lot less likely to want to do the work. I still haven't had a chance to check it out yet... On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Chris Sewell <lunamusic@mac.com> wrote: > Why not just use YouTube? Perspective buyers are always searching for > gear on there. > > > On Feb 28, 2008, at 7:58 PM, Tom Ritchford wrote: > > > I think the website will be really easy to pull off. I just need to > > get a time in front of the camera, or someone else needs to deliver a > > movie, for the ball to be rolling. > > > > Making the website itself, registering, hosting, that's like an hour > > of my time. > > > > I have a theory that once we get a few movies, other people will chime > > in. Or at least, we'll have a few moves. > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Teddy Kumpel <teddybut@mac.com> > > wrote: > >> I'm down with this Tom... the RC-50, while my main looper at this > >> point, is > >> really annoying because of the glitches, midi sync and time > >> stretching. > >> > >> which do you think would be more effective, a class action letter > >> from a > >> lawyer or the website? or both have to happen? > >> The suit is a good idea because, after all, their own marketing > >> blurbs tout > >> all those features as key reasons why to buy the thing. > >> > >> teddy k > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Feb 26, 2008, at 2:01 PM, Tom Ritchford wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:34 AM, doc rossi <docittern@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Feb 26, 2008, at 9:24 AM, Tom Ritchford wrote: > >>> > >>>> If we make a big fuss, saying, "YOUR UNIT HAS SERIOUS ISSUES AND > >>>> YOU > >>> > >>>> WON'T FIX THEM" then it will be bad PR for them. at least we get > >>>> to > >>>> cost them some $$$.... because if people really believe "they make > >>>> crappy products they won't support" then they won't buy them! > >>> > >>> I appreciate the idea, but I'm not sure they are worried about PR - > >> > >> There isn't a company in the world that sells to consumers that isn't > >> worried about PR. I mean, they care enough to put out their own > >> magazine. > >> > >> Believe you me, this is the sort of conversation that companies are > >> terrified of: > >> > >> "I'm going to get a Roland xxx" > >> "Oh, my friend had endless trouble with Roland's yyy -- don't do it." > >> > >> Whole companies have collapsed based on that sort of thing. > >> > >> If you read the explanation from tech support, it's really > >> dishonest. They > >> don't want to fix their old products because they're busy making new > >> products. In other words, it's a massive con to get your money with > >> products that don't work, and they'll never fix. > >> > >> So. I'll set up the domain, and make some movies. My movies > >> probably won't > >> come for a week, as even though I have a nice camera, it stays near > >> the > >> gig.... so get on your movies. > >> > >> > >> I'm also realizing that it might be fun to sue them in small claims > >> court... > >> as it isn't very time-consuming for me, and they probably won't > >> show up to > >> contest it. > >> > >> I have a particular hatred of being ripped off by large > >> corporations because > >> you know they're doing it to thousands of others. > > > > > > > > -- > > /t > > > > -- /t