Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
If you guys want, I could set up a MySpace/disgruntledRC50users page. We could then all add our names, link to your videos, and link to any pertinent sites. On Feb 29, 2008, at 8:24 PM, Tom Ritchford wrote: > Well, of course. I'm not intending to host the videos myself! > > But we need a central page to point people to with the text > explanation. > > HOWEVER, if sound priority mode really works, I'm a lot less likely to > want to do the work. I still haven't had a chance to check it out > yet... > > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Chris Sewell <lunamusic@mac.com> > wrote: >> Why not just use YouTube? Perspective buyers are always searching for >> gear on there. >> >> >> On Feb 28, 2008, at 7:58 PM, Tom Ritchford wrote: >> >>> I think the website will be really easy to pull off. I just need to >>> get a time in front of the camera, or someone else needs to >>> deliver a >>> movie, for the ball to be rolling. >>> >>> Making the website itself, registering, hosting, that's like an hour >>> of my time. >>> >>> I have a theory that once we get a few movies, other people will >>> chime >>> in. Or at least, we'll have a few moves. >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Teddy Kumpel <teddybut@mac.com> >>> wrote: >>>> I'm down with this Tom... the RC-50, while my main looper at this >>>> point, is >>>> really annoying because of the glitches, midi sync and time >>>> stretching. >>>> >>>> which do you think would be more effective, a class action letter >>>> from a >>>> lawyer or the website? or both have to happen? >>>> The suit is a good idea because, after all, their own marketing >>>> blurbs tout >>>> all those features as key reasons why to buy the thing. >>>> >>>> teddy k >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Feb 26, 2008, at 2:01 PM, Tom Ritchford wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:34 AM, doc rossi <docittern@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 26, 2008, at 9:24 AM, Tom Ritchford wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> If we make a big fuss, saying, "YOUR UNIT HAS SERIOUS ISSUES AND >>>>>> YOU >>>>> >>>>>> WON'T FIX THEM" then it will be bad PR for them. at least we get >>>>>> to >>>>>> cost them some $$$.... because if people really believe "they >>>>>> make >>>>>> crappy products they won't support" then they won't buy them! >>>>> >>>>> I appreciate the idea, but I'm not sure they are worried about >>>>> PR - >>>> >>>> There isn't a company in the world that sells to consumers that >>>> isn't >>>> worried about PR. I mean, they care enough to put out their own >>>> magazine. >>>> >>>> Believe you me, this is the sort of conversation that companies are >>>> terrified of: >>>> >>>> "I'm going to get a Roland xxx" >>>> "Oh, my friend had endless trouble with Roland's yyy -- don't do >>>> it." >>>> >>>> Whole companies have collapsed based on that sort of thing. >>>> >>>> If you read the explanation from tech support, it's really >>>> dishonest. They >>>> don't want to fix their old products because they're busy making >>>> new >>>> products. In other words, it's a massive con to get your money >>>> with >>>> products that don't work, and they'll never fix. >>>> >>>> So. I'll set up the domain, and make some movies. My movies >>>> probably won't >>>> come for a week, as even though I have a nice camera, it stays near >>>> the >>>> gig.... so get on your movies. >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm also realizing that it might be fun to sue them in small claims >>>> court... >>>> as it isn't very time-consuming for me, and they probably won't >>>> show up to >>>> contest it. >>>> >>>> I have a particular hatred of being ripped off by large >>>> corporations because >>>> you know they're doing it to thousands of others. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> /t >>> >> >> > > > > -- > /t >