Support |
> One particularly cool patch is one I made in the TC Fireworx > I unfortunately was forced to sell one year ago. This patch You still have to get over that loss of the FireworX, don't you? *g* All kidding aside, the FireworX, together with the Clavia MicroModular is definitely the most flexible effects processor I have (or have had). And I believe that is true for everyone among us except for Luca Formentini and his H8000FW. > buffer reversed. Unfortunately the FireworX didn't have CPU > power enough to use two such processes in parallel and with > inverted quantize periods Actually, the FireworX in my opinion only has one big flaw, and that is lack of DSP power. There were so many occasions where I was working on a patch (and a pretty normal one at that) where I just had to decide whether I could get that slight distortion after the feedback or the moving filter after the chorus...not possible to do both. An unfortunate design decision by TC - if it wasn't for that wimpy processor, I would've been using it a lot more. > - that would have been awesome! If working in software you > could set that up though, since todays laptops are way more powerful. So why don't you do it? Rainer