Re: OT: Hey Loopers< MF is blowing out Mackie SRM 350 p.a.portable PA speakers

["L.A. Angulo" <labaloops@yahoo.com>]

i had the RCFs for a while but i found them too brilliant for my 
taste,they also seem to "hiss" quite a bit when you are not 
playing.Nevertheless they are very nice and they are the smartest designed 
of all with handles on the sides and top plus great cover bags!
cheers
Luis



www.myspace.com/luisangulocom


--- On Fri, 7/18/08, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

> From: andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: OT:   Hey Loopers< MF is blowing out Mackie SRM 350 
>p.a.portable PA speakers
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Date: Friday, July 18, 2008, 12:29 AM
> Krispen Hartung wrote:
> 
> > I love the RCFs, but realistically there is no
> "dramatic" difference 
> > between them, the Mackie's, and JBLs. 
> 
> 
> Personally, when I heard the JBLs was the first time I ever
> thought 
> about getting a pa. I can get "my sound" on good
> studio monitors,
> and on the JBLs, but not on anything else.
> (although the Mackies are acceptable, especially if not too
> loud)
> 
> I don't know the RCF's, but I find quite a lot of
> difference between the
> JBL's and the Mackies. 
> I prefer the JBL's for the relatively un-colored sound
> and find the Mackies 
> a bit fatiguing to listen to, especially as the volume goes
> up.
> However, I'm sure there's folks who'd prefer
> the "punchy" Mackie sound.
> 
> I'd hazard a guess that the different speakers are
> aimed at different
> types of music.
> 
> 
> 
> > r, so we are really 
> > starting to spice hairs and get into personal
> preference.
> > 
> 
> Indeed, there's a lot of pa's out there which sound
> so much worse than
> these ones. (ever been to a London venue? :-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ..but then I spice my hair over every other aspect of the
> sound too.
> (with Dalek Shampoo of course )
> 
> 
> andy butler