Re: Frequencies was Re: AW: AW: O T: new Macbook wíthOUT Firewire :(

["Per Boysen" <perboysen@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:59 AM, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> 
wrote:

> It's also hard to make the clock really stable, and more so as the 
>frequency
> increases.
> I've heard that sampling at 192kHz often sounds worse than at lower 
>sample
> rates
> due to the increased jitter of a less stable clock.


A college looked into this, did some comparative tests, and reported
that the best general fidelity was found at around 88,2 or 96 kHz. I
have no reason to doubt that, although I myself stick to 41,1 kHz for
creativity reasons (or 48kkHz when producing for video finalizing, for
technical reasons).

-- 
Greetings from Sweden

Per Boysen
www.boysen.se (Swedish)
www.looproom.com (international)
www.myspace.com/perboysen
www.stockholm-athens.com