Support |
Perhaps it depends if you needing a technical/semantic distinction or a distinction in common usage. Without wanting to play devil's advocate, but isn't ALL sampling a form of synthetic reproduction of an original waveform? The arguments above could be taken to imply that photographs are 'the real thing' whilst paintings are merely artistic approximations, when both are just differing forms of synthetic production. Similarly, wavetable synthesis, which I don't claim to understand in technical detail, involves synthesis based on sampling. It is also not difficult to conceive of recombinant sampling techniques that will generate wholly new sounds based on sample mixing at anywhere from the sample level of microsound to the sonic event level. In thus respect, a dualism as stated is possibly too simplistic. but, yes, for the purposes of common usage, sampling involves the use of "real" sounds while synthesis, synthetic ones ;) -looplog On 11/30/08, SP Goodman <spgoodman@earthlight.net> wrote: > From: "Bruce Gilman" <cuica@interworld.net> >> >> I have a question for composers or performers who use samples. >> >> Sorry to wave my ignorance. Please indulge the ignorant. >> >> >> If you write or play with samples, let's say string samples, are you >> using synthesized sounds? >> >> >> Again my apologies for interrupting, >> B.G. > > Hi Bruce, > > The source of the sample would determine whether the sound being used is > synthesized or not, I'd guess. I never found a way to satisfactorily > replicate Tablas, for instance. When I got Fruity Loops (now FLStudio) >and > a sample-set of Tabla sounds I could 'do' as such without having to >resort > to synth programming-fiddling. Moreover if one uses FLStudio one is >using > non-synthesized samples in many cases. I lean towards the use of 'real' >but > then I'm a grumpy old fart to some. > > SP Goodman > * > http://www.youtube.com/spgoodman > http://www.last.fm/music/Stephen+Goodman > > > -- networking practice for sound environments :: http://nowhere.iamnobody.net