Support |
Scott Hansen wrote: "as for the "old days sound"....i don't know...i saw springsteen back in march in omaha, and i thought the sound SUCKED!!!! it was way too loud,and just unpleasant to hear.i saw him on tour for his 90's solo albums back in '94, and that was a GREAT concert." You are soooo right, Scott. I was really exhausted when I wrote that piece of vitriol about subsonics but I had meant to say (and forgot to write) that I had just seen Springsteen and was horribly bummed out that the sound SUCKED!!!! One of the culprits: you guessed it, a stupidly over loud and over subbed kick drum and bass guitar sound.I was so bummed as I had dragged a young student of mine to see the concert on the whole basis of , "Hey, you have to see a truly great rhythm section in rock and roll who sound fantastic live." The thing I"m finding just hilarious is the trend in drum sizes in the indie rock scene. All the kids are hearing these huge subbed out kick drum sounds and they can't get anything resembling it acoustically, so all the drum manufacturers are starting to sell 4 piece kits with massive (and deep shelled , which increases subsonic mulitplication) 26" and 28" inch kick drums. You can make a properly tuned deep 18" kick have a huge subsonic sound with a very long envelope through the use of eq and subs....................Now these kids are playing kick drums that are impossible to get a tight sound out of. Play some of those typical Bonham 16th note triplet double fills on kick when it's running through the typical sub woofed system and it sounds completely unintelligble, rhythmically speaking. Mind you, Bonham used a 26" kick frequently (though not always despite rumors to the contrary) but there were no subs in the PAs in those days at all. Arrrrgggggghhhhh!, NEVER get me drunk and ask me about the subject, I become ahorrible stereotypical loud bore on the subject. Come to think of it, I think I may be a horrible stereotypical bore on this subject completely sober (which I am 98% of the time)