Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
per,
have you ever tested the latency between the EDP and Mobius?or anyone
outhere?
www.myspace.com/luisangulocom
--- On Wed, 1/14/09, Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Sooperlooper or Mobius? Going back to software.
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Date: Wednesday, January 14, 2009, 1:28 AM
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:00 AM, marcus kirby
> <nrvana8775@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I love having the ability to control multiple loops at
> once, and have a
> > visual representation of it. Also, the sooperlooper
> GUI was really
> > intuitive, to me anyway, and I want to start using it
> again. I've read that
> > Mobius is a good contender, but I thought the GUI was
> ugly.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
>
>
> Chose the looper that meets your demands! Here are some
> points to evaluate:
>
> If you have to run the looper as an AU plug-in SooperLooper
> is the
> best. Using SooperLooper means you have to give up cuing up
> many loops
> when playing. You can still run many parallel loops and
> sort of faking
> a cue system by some smart muting and unmuting of loops.
> SooperLooper
> stays rather close to the EDP concept.
>
> The AU format is also well met by Augustus Loop from Expert
> Sleepers.
> This looper runs better for excsessive speed shifting and
> now also
> supports scripting that lets you set up four of them in OSC
> sync to
> create a four track multi looper. No cuing up of loops
> though. Works a
> little differently than the EDP concept.
>
> If you can live with a VST plug-in and needs to cue up
> loops on
> several tracks Mobius is the king. Mobius is also better if
> you want
> to play around a lot with speed shifting. Finally, Mobius
> scripting
> option makes it extremely expandable and customizable. If
> you want
> that. As for ugly GUI - you can change it to the colors you
> prefer!
>
> Greetings from Sweden
>
> Per Boysen
> www.boysen.se
> www.perboysen.com