Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Why I think "Max for Live" is huge

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_V

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:15 AM, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
I snipped out the most interesting bit:-


"In Music-N terms, Max supplies the orchestra while Live holds the score. The "score" however is not just MIDI notes. It can be audio, triggered and manipulated in all the sophisticated ways Live provides. Or it can be automation, drawn inside Live and fed to Max as sample-accurate audio-rate ramps if you like. It's equally possible to work the other way, where Max represents the score and Live represents the orchestra."


wonder what he imagines we understand by "Music-N" :-)

Anyway, what I find interesting is the "Max represents the score bit".
Does that mean that Max gets to play with softsynths and fx from Live
....or does it mean that max gets to trigger playback, recording etc?
....does Max get to control the tempo of Live ?

andy butler




Neil Goldstein wrote:
from the creator of Max:

http://www.cycling74.com/story/2009/1/15/112631/799








--
Warren
http://www.ubetoo.com/Artist.taf?_ArtistId=6679
http://www.warrensirota.com