Re: using the EDP midi synced as slave

["L.Angulo" <labaloops@yahoo.com>]

Great link Claude thanx!

www.myspace.com/luisangulocom


--- On Tue, 4/21/09, Claude Voit <c.voit@vtx.ch> wrote:

> From: Claude Voit <c.voit@vtx.ch>
> Subject: Re: using the EDP midi synced as slave
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Date: Tuesday, April 21, 2009, 4:14 AM
> Please get that straight
> 
> I dont understand why you would use a _time_ reference
> where you need a Tempo and bar/beats/sub beats reference.
> 
> midi clock could be better and more stable if the bit rate
> would be brought to the today bandwidth standards but its
> non sense to use a standard (MTC) that is not intended for
> Tempo sync
> 
> Midi time clock is not Midi clock
> Midi time clock just transmits where its at in the song in
> HH:MM:SS:FF (hour,minutes,seconds,frames) no tempo,bars,
> etc
> 
> 
> http://www.tweakheadz.com/sync_mmc_mtc_smpte.htm
> 
> 
> Claude
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Per Boysen a écrit :
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:56 AM, L.Angulo <labaloops@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >> So is there a chance the EDP would respond to
> those functions if i used a sequencer > with better midi
> implementation?
> > 
> > I guess "better midi implementation" means sending
> MTC. That's indeed
> > better than MIDI Clock but I'm not sure the EDP
> supports it. Should't
> > you be able to record any need MIDI in the sequencer
> to have it sent
> > out into the EDP? Just noticed Andy's reply and
> hopefully Matthias
> > will chime in.
> > 
> > Per
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>