Re: Looperlative questions

[Mark Hamburg <mark@grubmah.com>]

On May 28, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Simeon Harris wrote:

> i think what mark's getting at here are the quantisation features we  
> were discussing a while ago. one of the ideas put forward was to  
> insert a function into a string of commands which would then  
> quantise those commands following the function according to some  
> global, or non-global, criteria. the aim was to quantise certain  
> behaviours so they occurred at the loop boundary (for example).
>
> this hasn't been implemented yet, but i think bob is thinking about  
> it....although there is a replace function which can be quantised to  
> occur at a user defined subdivision of the loop length. (mucho fun  
> with a momentary pedal and the number of subdivisions can be  
> different for each loop)

That's exactly what I was asking about. Thanks.

Mark