[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: OT: New MBP... or not? (Firewire still necessary?)

To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
From: "Buzap Buzap" <buzap@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: OT: New MBP... or not? (Firewire still necessary?)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:31:21 +0200

Hi Per

well, my information is this:
32-bit chip architecture can address up to 3.4 GB of ram, which is the 
limit for the current C2Ds.

So, essentially you could put in 4GB RAM and use 3.4GB of it.

I believe this is also true for Windows.

best regards
Buzap

-- 
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: New MBP... or not? (Firewire still necessary?)
  - From: Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>

References:
- OT: New MBP... or not? (Firewire still necessary?)
  - From: buzap@gmx.net
- Re: OT: New MBP... or not? (Firewire still necessary?)
  - From: Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>
- Re: OT: New MBP... or not? (Firewire still necessary?)
  - From: "Buzap Buzap" <buzap@gmx.net>
- Re: OT: New MBP... or not? (Firewire still necessary?)
  - From: Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>
- Re: OT: New MBP... or not? (Firewire still necessary?)
  - From: antonyhequet@yahoo.com
- Re: OT: New MBP... or not? (Firewire still necessary?)
  - From: Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: OT: New MBP... or not? (Firewire still necessary?)
Next by Date: Re: OT: New MBP... or not? (Firewire still necessary?)
Previous by Thread: Re: OT: New MBP... or not? (Firewire still necessary?)
Next by Thread: Re: OT: New MBP... or not? (Firewire still necessary?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread
- Author