[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: The loop effect I'm wanting today: A smart replace
That assumes that I want to do things on loop boundaries. If I can live
with working on loop boundaries, a lot of things become easier. But maybe
I feel that the new loop should start midway through the existing cycle
but eventually replace the old cycle. The loop boundary in that case is
somewhat arbitrary and simply an artifact of the initial recording. What
may matter is the loop time. I could potentially explicitly change the
loop start point, but that might needlessly disturb any tempo clocks being
generated by the looper.
Mark
On Aug 15, 2010, at 11:35 PM, Grant wrote:
> Couldn't you just arm the first loop to end when it's finished and arm a
>second loop to start recording when the first loop ends as well? Once the
>second loop is created you could begin overdubs and feedback would not
>need to be changed at all (always set to 100%). Wouldn't that work?
>
> G
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Hamburg <mark@grubmah.com>
>> Sent: Aug 14, 2010 2:14 PM
>> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>> Subject: The loop effect I'm wanting today: A smart replace
>>
>> Here is what I find myself wanting today. I don't think either the EDP
>or the Looperlative can be readily programmed to do just this. I think of
>this as being essentially smart replace.
>>
>> Tap pedal and it goes into "replace" mode. The old loop plays through
>but does so at 0% feedback so that it won't repeat again.
>>
>> One cycle later relative to the initial tap it switches automatically
>to 100% overdub so that the new loop can end up seamless.
>>
>> Tap the pedal again and it stops recording but stays at 100% feedback.
>>
>> The tricky part relative to existing loopers is the automatic switch
>from 0% feedback to full feedback at the one cycle mark. If one gave up
>on the ability to tap at arbitrary times, then it might be possible to
>achieve this with a quantized sequence of operations.
>>
>> Does anyone know of something that will do this?
>>
>> Mark
>>
>
>