Support |
On Mar 20, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Mark Hamburg wrote: > On Mar 20, 2011, at 12:31 PM, andy butler wrote: > >> Simeon Harris wrote: >>> I'm not sure this is possible with the lp1. >> >> It's not, and I'm sure Mark knows that. > > I'm aware that there are a few things that just aren't possible and that >many of the other things I want could be done if the controller were >sophisticated enough to model the state of the LP1 (and really annoying >in cases where the model and the LP1 got into a disagreement) but that >requires a really sophisticated controller. I also know that it fits >pretty much exactly with the playback and general loop manipulation >capabilities of the LP1, so it's a matter of how it gets controlled >rather than what it does -- not to say that's easy. But I was really pleased when I figured out how to map most of the functionality I care about to a reasonable number of switches. But then I'm stuck with the gulf between those switches and the actual looping machinery. Mark