Support |
I on the other hand have better experiences with nuclear energy, which when managed safely - ie not by a government drone 'jobs' op - is quite a good substitute for oil power, and despite rhetorical comments is not "war on nature": my godfather was until his retirement a scientist at the famous Oak Ridge facility for years, and not only had six non-mutated children, but is still quite alive and well. I believe that it is only by USING this stuff that it can be improved further, making more possible the science present fiction of "Mr Fusion". -----Original Message----- From: Andy Owens Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 5:54 AM To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Subject: Re: our war on nature,when will it stop... (O.T.) On Apr 13, 2011, at 10:49 AM, "William Walker" <billwalker@baymoon.com> wrote: > will be to wake up the world to move away from nuclear energy and on to > cleaner more sustainable forms of energy In relation to those issues, it is interesting that several fairly high profile anti-nuc power advocates have changed their position due to the fact that the fears of nuc disaster havent been realized and their feeling is if an old outdated plant can take that kind of hit and not be a major frickdown, then maybe it's not as dangerous as they thought. Heard two people with that mind change on NPR. I myself have lost only one uncle to nuclear energy, my mom's brother was a pretty famous nuclear physisist who died of cancer from years of exposure in the old days, but with relatives in both the eastern and western Kentucky coal mines I am sure that body count is a lot higher, in the dozens if not hundreds, power always has a price, even seemingly clean hydro-electric power causes huge ecological impact from overbuilding of man made lakes. Heck lets just all unplug!!!! Andy O