Support |
Rick Walker wrote: > On 7/22/64 11:59 AM, andy butler wrote: >> Really though, and I think Rick would agree, this is >> all "crisis management". If you're having to re-sync >> then it's going to sound bad...a better strategy is preferable. > Errrr, with complete respect, I don't entirely agree with you, Andy, > merely from a lot of personal experience > playing in non-synced situations that involve loops. > I agree with you totally Rick, I wasn't thinking about syncing loop to loop. I've seen you do it...with the retrig being hit *before* the timing errors get noticeable. The thread was originally about staying in sync with a non-looping ensemble, a context where re-triggering is a last resort. andy