[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Sound vs function

To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
From: Daniel Thomas <danielthomas4@mac.com>
Subject: Re: Sound vs function
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:51:27 -0700

> BUT: Computer-processed music always seems to always have a low-end 
> sheen to it. 
> 
> WHAT TO DO?

Invest in high end analog gear for the input path. And if you really want 
to full tilt boogie into the best of both worlds, get into summing analog 
stem mixes at output.  

Anyone doing any high fidelity analog audio in their looping rig?  (Not 
me.. the gear is to heavy to schlep)  

daniel

On Jun 16, 2011, at 1:45 PM, marcus kirby wrote:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sound vs function
  - From: marcus kirby <marcusloops@gmail.com>
- Re: Sound vs function
  - From: todd reynolds <toddreyn@gmail.com>

References:
- Sound vs function
  - From: marcus kirby <marcusloops@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Sound vs function
Next by Date: Re: Sound vs function
Previous by Thread: Sound vs function
Next by Thread: Re: Sound vs function
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread
- Author