Support |
Why not use a looper with more than one loop? Also, if it's stereo, you could use one channel for guitar and one for vocal stuff (routed as desired). G -----Original Message----- >The idea is: I'm trying to convince a singer to start a (pop/rock) duo >where I play acoustic guitar. I need to make loops, usuall only one >loop per song is needed for the songs I've been working on. But every >now and then, I need a second loop faster than I can erase the first >loop. Remember, I'm not saving loops on the fly or touching the pedal >with my hands. It's all foot-only operation. By putting a second RC-20 >in series with the one I've got, I'd have all the capability that I >need. I'm not interested in using loops prepared in advance or saving >what I play on the fly so memory slots and anything more spiffy aren't >desired. I figure getting a second RC-20 ought to be cheaper than >selling what I've got and replacing it with something more capable like >an RC-50, for example. > >Cheers, > >Bill >