Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Checkout the Boomerang III. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoKF0gbW6Ko http://www.boomerangmusic.com/ Pros: 3 loops. Flexibility to do a rhythm loop plus 2 loops that can be switched between sequentially. Stereo. Reverse and half-speed support. Cons: No MIDI sync in or out (in case you care about drum machines or the like). Recording seamless loops -- i.e., the record into overdub maneuver -- involves a really complicated foot dance. (I'm pushing hard for that to get addressed in a future software revision.) Mark On Jul 8, 2011, at 11:20 PM, Grant wrote: > Why not use a looper with more than one loop? Also, if it's stereo, you > could use one channel for guitar and one for vocal stuff (routed as > desired). > > G > > > -----Original Message----- >> The idea is: I'm trying to convince a singer to start a (pop/rock) duo >> where I play acoustic guitar. I need to make loops, usuall only one >> loop per song is needed for the songs I've been working on. But every >> now and then, I need a second loop faster than I can erase the first >> loop. Remember, I'm not saving loops on the fly or touching the pedal >> with my hands. It's all foot-only operation. By putting a second >> RC-20 >> in series with the one I've got, I'd have all the capability that I >> need. I'm not interested in using loops prepared in advance or saving >> what I play on the fly so memory slots and anything more spiffy aren't >> desired. I figure getting a second RC-20 ought to be cheaper than >> selling what I've got and replacing it with something more capable like >> an RC-50, for example. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Bill >> > >